Publicity has in fact understood the tradition of the oil painting more thoroughly than most art historians. And so the quoted work of art (and this is why it is so useful to publicity) says two almost contradictory things at the same time: it denotes wealth and spirituality: it implies that the purchase being proposed is both a luxury and a cultural value.
The happiness of being envied is glamour.īut a work of art also suggests a cultural authority, a form of dignity, even of wisdom, which is superior to any vulgar material interest an oil painting belongs to the cultural heritage it is a reminder of what it means to be a cultivated European. Its promise is not of pleasure, but of happiness: happiness as judged from the outside by others. Publicity is about social relations, not objects. Yet what makes this self-which-he-might-be enviable? The envy of others. The image then makes him envious of himself as he might be. It offers him an image of himself made glamorous by the product or opportunity it is trying to sell. Publicity is always about the future buyer. Publicity is never a celebration of a pleasure-in-itself. This is why publicity can never really afford to be about the product or opportunity it is proposing to the buyer who is not yet enjoying it. The more convincingly publicity conveys the pleasure of bathing in a warm, distant sea, the more the spectator-buyer will become aware that he is hundreds of miles away from that sea and the more remote the chance of bathing in it will seem to him. But it cannot offer the real object of pleasure and there is no convincing substitute for a pleasure in that pleasure's own term s.
Publicity begins by working on a natural appetite for pleasure. Clothes, food, cars, cosmetics, baths, sunshine are real things to be enjoyed in themselves. Publicity is effective precisely because it feeds upon the real. It is important here not to confuse publicity with the pleasure or benefits to be enjoyed from the things it advertises. And publicity is the process of manufacturing glamour. The state of being envied is what constitutes glamour. Publicity persuades us of such a transformation by showing us people who have apparently been transformed and are, as a result, enviable. This more, it proposes, will make us in some way richer - even though we will be poorer by having spent our money. It proposes to each of us that we transform ourselves, or our lives, by buying something more. Within publicity, choices are offered between this cream and that cream, that car and this car, but publicity as a system only makes a single proposal. Publicity is not merely an assembly of competing messages: it is a language in itself which is always being used to make the same general proposal. It is true that in publicity one brand of manufacture, one firm, competes with another but it is also true that every publicity image confirms and enhances every other.
John berger ways of seeing camera free#
Publicity, it is thought, offers a free choice. The great hoardings and the publicity neons of the cities of capitalism are the immediate visible sign of 'The Free World'.įor many in Eastern Europe such images in the West sum up what they in the East lack. It is closely related to certain ideas about freedom: freedom of choice for the purchaser: freedom of enterprise for the manufacturer. Publicity is usually explained and justified as a competitive medium which ultimately benefits the public (the consumer) and the most efficient manufacturers - and thus the national economy. We are static they are dynamic - until the newspaper is thrown away, the television programme continues or the poster is posted over. Yet despite this, one has the impression that publicity images are continually passing us, like express trains on their way to some distant terminus.
John berger ways of seeing camera tv#
Usually it is we who pass the image - walking, travelling, turning a page on the tv screen it is somewhat different but even then we are theoretically the active agent - we can look away, turn down the sound, make some coffee. For example, the fact that these images belong to the moment but speak of the future produces a strange effect which has become so familiar that we scarcely notice it. But we accept the total system of publicity images as we accept an element of climate. A person may notice a particular image or piece of information because it corresponds to some particular interest he has. We are now so accustomed to being addressed by these images that we scarcely notice their total impact.